Some people think it’s a category mistake even to address Donald Trump’s trade policy as an actual thing rather than a mess of prejudices and contradictions, and that for other governments to employ logic and game theory in engaging with it is like trying to play chess with an angry rhino. They may have a point. It’s not a thing of clarity and beauty. Still, if the Republican candidate does get elected, his policy positions will at least delineate the landscape for his administration’s internal battles.
有些人認(rèn)為，即使將唐納德?特朗普(Donald Trump)的貿(mào)易政策視為一件真實(shí)的事情，而不是一團(tuán)偏見和矛盾的混亂，也是一種類別錯(cuò)誤。其他國家的政府試圖用邏輯和博弈論來應(yīng)對(duì)，就像試圖與一頭憤怒的犀牛下棋一樣。他們可能有道理。這并不是一件清晰而美好的事情。不過，如果這位共和黨候選人真的當(dāng)選，他的政策立場(chǎng)至少會(huì)為其政府內(nèi)部的斗爭描繪出一個(gè)圖景。
您已閱讀9%（680字），剩余91%（6639字）包含更多重要信息，訂閱以繼續(xù)探索完整內(nèi)容，并享受更多專屬服務(wù)。